Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not getting the possibility to perform post-hoc testing for Bayesian ANOVA #588

Open
AugustOlsson opened this issue Jan 14, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@AugustOlsson
Copy link

Hi, I can't seem to perform post-hoc testing for Bayesian ANOVAs even though that function has (as I understood it) been implemented.

  • JASP version: 0.11.1

  • OS name and version: Windows 10 Education

  • Analysis: Between Subjects BANOVA and Mixed BANOVA

  • Bug description: When looking at the post-hoc test menue I do not get the possiblity to conduct post-hoc testing of the interactions, a function which has been implemented as I understood it. See screenshots

Post-Hoc Between BANOVA
Post-Hoc Mixed BANOVA

Best,
August

@vandenman
Copy link
Contributor

Posthoc tests are possible for individual variables but not for interactions. Implementing it for interactions will require some additional work, in particular to get the multiplicity correction right. I do think it's a good idea though.

@AugustOlsson
Copy link
Author

Hi,

Ah, I am sorry, then I somehow missunderstood which types of post-hoc tests that had been implemented. Thanks for remarking this as enhancement! It would be a great addition :). Thanks for all your great work with JASP:

@piolho-eefe
Copy link

Hi, is there any news on the implementation of post hoc tests for interactions in Bayesian ANOVA?
Thank you.

@JohnnyDoorn
Copy link

Hi @piolho-eefe ,

Unfortunately not, since we have had to focus on other issues for the next release. This will serve as a nice reminder though that it would be very nice feature! I will discuss with @vandenman about how best to tackle this for a future release.

Kind regards
Johnny

@tomtomme
Copy link
Member

tomtomme commented Jan 15, 2024

Related: #670
Also I assigned vandenman here too, since he was assigned to one of the duplicates I closed.

@tomtomme
Copy link
Member

tomtomme commented Feb 9, 2024

@AugustOlsson
Would you agree, that this one can be closed as a duplicate of #670
?

@AugustOlsson
Copy link
Author

@AugustOlsson Would you agree, that this one can be closed as a duplicate of #670 ?

I guess it is almost the same thing? But I am not entirely sure as I am not to knowledgeble about simple main effects analyses. Dosn't a simple main effect analyses only look at the effect of each main effect in isolation (holding the other main effect constant) whereas a post-hoc test of an interaction would also (for example in a 2x2 faktorial design) compare if there is a difference in the dependent variable between lvl1 of independent variable 1 and lvl2 of independent variable 2?

In practice when implementing one of these the other one might though naturally follow?

Best,
August

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants