Add toDescriptor to ResolvedMethodDeclaration

[vanHekthor]

Fixes #3808.

Adds toDescriptor() to ResolvedMethodDeclarations with all the needed implementations. It was also necessary to add toDescriptor() for ResolvedType.

For convenience, a TypeUtils class was added that contains utility methods for getting the descriptors for java.lang.reflect.Method and primitive classes (compare to ASM).

Found issue:

Inner classes(/enums) do not have the correct fully qualified name. You get Class.InnerClass instead of Class$InnerClass. This also effects my test cases for the valueOf and values method of enums.
For now, it should be fine, but I think this needs to be addressed in a future issue and PR.

[jlerbsc]

Can you add unit test for all primitive type and remove the unit test dependency with the javassist library.

[vanHekthor]

Can you add unit test for all primitive type and remove the unit test dependency with the javassist library.

Did that in the latest commits e6901c3 and 358e536.

[jlerbsc]

Thank you for your contribution which will be the last of the year. It will be available in the next version (end of January) because version 3.24.10 was released this afternoon.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3819 (655af91) into master (e2590f3) will increase coverage by 0.033%.
The diff coverage is 81.632%.

❗ Current head 655af91 differs from pull request most recent head 13ceb6a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 13ceb6a to get more accurate results

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##              master     #3819       +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage     57.571%   57.604%   +0.033%     
- Complexity      2182      2185        +3     
===============================================
  Files            638       639        +1     
  Lines          33911     33959       +48     
  Branches        5864      5870        +6     
===============================================
+ Hits           19523     19562       +39     
- Misses         12306     12314        +8     
- Partials        2082      2083        +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
AlsoSlowTests	57.604% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
javaparser-core	50.262% <0.000%> (-0.082%)	⬇️
javaparser-symbol-solver	36.641% <81.632%> (+0.063%)	⬆️
jdk-10	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-11	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-12	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.039%)	⬆️
jdk-13	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-14	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-15	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-16	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-8	57.602% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
jdk-9	57.600% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
macos-latest	57.595% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
ubuntu-latest	57.590% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️
windows-latest	57.587% <81.632%> (+0.033%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...parser/resolution/types/ResolvedPrimitiveType.java	78.571% <0.000%> (-1.139%)	⬇️
...thub/javaparser/resolution/types/ResolvedType.java	65.517% <0.000%> (-2.340%)	⬇️
...aparser/resolution/types/ResolvedTypeVariable.java	83.783% <0.000%> (-2.328%)	⬇️
.../javaparser/resolution/types/ResolvedVoidType.java	80.000% <0.000%> (-20.000%)	⬇️
...in/java/com/github/javaparser/utils/TypeUtils.java	82.142% <82.142%> (ø)
.../com/github/javaparser/ast/type/PrimitiveType.java	77.611% <100.000%> (+2.202%)	⬆️
...javaparser/resolution/types/ResolvedArrayType.java	87.878% <100.000%> (+1.671%)	⬆️
...parser/resolution/types/ResolvedReferenceType.java	79.670% <100.000%> (+0.112%)	⬆️
...rmodel/declarations/JavaParserEnumDeclaration.java	60.126% <100.000%> (+0.511%)	⬆️
...odel/declarations/JavaParserMethodDeclaration.java	75.757% <100.000%> (+0.757%)	⬆️
... and 2 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e2590f3...13ceb6a. Read the comment docs.

[vanHekthor]

Thank you for your contribution which will be the last of the year. It will be available in the next version (end of January) because version 3.24.10 was released this afternoon.

Very nice, thanks!

Seems like maven_test (windows-latest, 8) failed the second time (even though it was successful the first time).
I have also fixed the import order now which caused the checkstyle test to fail.

[jlerbsc]

Seems like maven_test (windows-latest, 8) failed the second time (even though it was successful the first time).
I have also fixed the import order now which caused the checkstyle test to fail.

Please stop modifying the PR so that I can validate it.