Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linear-arbitrary-precision@3.2.1 breaks build 🚨 #2

Closed

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

🚨🚨🚨

linear-arbitrary-precision just published its new version 3.2.1, which is covered by your current version range. After updating it in your project the build went from success to failure.

This means your software is now malfunctioning, because of this update. Use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 20 commits .

  • bb8590f 3.2.1
  • 1d1500e refactor: use tap to extend
  • 393442d refactor(core): use core-arbitrary-precision
  • 7e0d0f9 3.2.0
  • f97356c Merge pull request #9 from javiercejudo/equals
  • 0d8eec8 feat(api): add equals method
  • dfe6e55 3.1.2
  • 9aa46b1 fix(floating-adapter): add valid version of dep
  • 81a4598 3.1.1
  • 965792d chore(package): unpin deps
  • 573716d Merge pull request #6 from javiercejudo/greenkeeper-gulp-coverage-0.3.37
  • 0b23118 chore(package): update gulp-coverage to version 0.3.37
  • c212774 Merge pull request #4 from javiercejudo/greenkeeper-gulp-istanbul-0.10.2
  • debe2a0 Merge pull request #5 from javiercejudo/greenkeeper-should-7.1.1
  • 8b27089 chore(package): update should to version 7.1.1

There are 20 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

@javiercejudo javiercejudo deleted the greenkeeper-linear-arbitrary-precision-3.2.1 branch November 8, 2015 03:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants