Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug: typo in 3.6.6 docs #128

Closed
dkwolfe4 opened this issue Jun 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Bug: typo in 3.6.6 docs #128

dkwolfe4 opened this issue Jun 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@dkwolfe4
Copy link

In section “JSON Response Content” of the 3.6.6 readthedocs, the example code imports requests rather than niquests. Seems to be a typo as the code calls niquests.get in the example.
Ousret added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2024
@Ousret
🔖 Release 3.6.7
0378805 
**Fixed**
- CaseInsensitiveDict repr (to string) causing an unexpected error when upstream have multiple values for a single header. (#129)

**Misc**
- Minor docs typos (#128)
- Reformated error messages in our OCSP module for better readability.
- Added real test cases for our OCSP module to ensure its reliability.
@Ousret Ousret mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2024
Merged
Ousret added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2024
@Ousret
🔖 Release 3.6.7
1063aa1 
**Fixed**
- CaseInsensitiveDict repr (to string) causing an unexpected error when upstream have multiple values for a single header. (#129)

**Misc**
- Minor docs typos (#128)
- Reformated error messages in our OCSP module for better readability.
- Added real test cases for our OCSP module to ensure its reliability.
Ousret added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 19, 2024
@Ousret
🔖 Release 3.6.7 (#130)
d2e8efa 
**Fixed**
- CaseInsensitiveDict repr (to string) causing an unexpected error when
upstream have multiple values for a single header. (#129)

**Misc**
- Minor docs typos (#128)
- Reformated error messages in our OCSP module for better readability.
- Added real test cases for our OCSP module to ensure its reliability.
@Ousret
Copy link

Ousret commented Jun 19, 2024

OK. After taking a look, there was several place where a similar typo was present.
Fixed in latest release.

@Ousret Ousret closed this as completed Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Ousret @dkwolfe4