Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid ambiguity in indirect constructors #186

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 12, 2023

Conversation

jbcoe
Copy link
Owner

@jbcoe jbcoe commented Nov 12, 2023

Fixes #159

@jbcoe jbcoe requested a review from Twon as a code owner November 12, 2023 00:28
@jbcoe jbcoe marked this pull request as draft November 12, 2023 00:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3d833bb) 100.00% compared to head (b539d0b) 100.00%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #186   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines          184       186    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits           184       186    +2     
Files Coverage Δ
indirect.h 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jbcoe
Copy link
Owner Author

jbcoe commented Nov 12, 2023

DRAFT.md needs updating

@jbcoe jbcoe marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2023 01:06
@jbcoe jbcoe merged commit d96bf04 into main Nov 12, 2023
24 checks passed
@jbcoe jbcoe deleted the dev-jbcoe-indirect-constructors-disambiguation branch November 12, 2023 01:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Variadic constructor of indirect is too greedy
2 participants