Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Two small enhancements to ultipro_google parser. #32

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 8, 2019

Conversation

jktomer
Copy link
Contributor

@jktomer jktomer commented Oct 4, 2019

No description provided.

Some of my pay statements do not have a YTD column for statements where there
are two rows with the same earnings type.
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 95

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 27 unchanged lines in 3 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 65.833%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
beancount_import/journal_editor.py 5 87.68%
beancount_import/reconcile.py 10 69.36%
beancount_import/webserver.py 12 33.69%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 91: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 8712
Relevant Lines: 12840

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 4, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 95

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 19 unchanged lines in 3 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 65.833%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
beancount_import/journal_editor.py 1 88.16%
beancount_import/webserver.py 8 34.74%
beancount_import/reconcile.py 10 69.36%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 91: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 13068
Relevant Lines: 19260

💛 - Coveralls

@jbms jbms merged commit 5a5386f into jbms:master Oct 8, 2019
@jktomer jktomer deleted the ultipro-parsing branch January 8, 2024 00:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants