Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

LOGTOOL-105 Option to have LoggingToolsProcessor to not use javax.ann… #47

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

LOGTOOL-105 Option to have LoggingToolsProcessor to not use javax.ann… #47

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Sanne
Copy link
Contributor

@Sanne Sanne commented Apr 22, 2016

@Sanne
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sanne commented Apr 22, 2016

Please wait a bit more before integrating this, I'm exploring an alternative solution which might not need patching of the AP.

@Sanne
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sanne commented Apr 22, 2016

I did indeed find an alternative, described on JIRA LOGTOOL-105

I'm leaving this open so you can decide if you'd like to have this option as well.

@jamezp
Copy link
Member

jamezp commented Apr 27, 2016

Thanks @Sanne. I'll leave it open for now and keep an eye on the jigsaw-dev mailing list.

@jamezp
Copy link
Member

jamezp commented Apr 7, 2017

@Sanne Can you let me know what you think of #60?

@Sanne Sanne mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2017
Merged
@jamezp
Copy link
Member

jamezp commented Apr 20, 2017

Closing this in favor of #60

@jamezp jamezp closed this Apr 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@Sanne @jamezp