Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 27, 2022. It is now read-only.

JBIDE-19753 - Investigate if Arquillian works fine with Sapphire 9.0.0 #111

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 21, 2015

Conversation

snjeza
Copy link
Member

@snjeza snjeza commented May 18, 2015

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19753
Investigate if Arquillian works fine with Sapphire 9.0.0

<import feature="org.eclipse.sapphire.ui.swt.xml.editor" version="8.0.0" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
<import feature="org.eclipse.sapphire.ui" version="8.0.0" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
<import feature="org.eclipse.sapphire.ui.swt.gef" version="8.0.0" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
<import feature="org.eclipse.sapphire" version="9.0.0" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sapphire changed its API in 9.0.0.201505051659 (included in Mars M7 update site). So any previous 9.0.0.* version (Mars M1-M6) won't work with this PR.
We should require 9.0.0.201505051659 (greaterOrEqual) here in the feature.xml and in all corresponding plugins.xml's.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have updated the patch.

org.eclipse.sapphire.java;bundle-version="0.7.1",
org.eclipse.sapphire.ui;bundle-version="0.7.1",
org.eclipse.sapphire.ui.swt.xml.editor;bundle-version="0.7.1",
org.eclipse.sapphire.platform;bundle-version="9.0.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would use 9.0.0.201505051659 in MANIFEST.MF too. It will help avoid problems if the plugin is installed as a dependency.

@snjeza snjeza merged commit 13932fd into jbosstools:master May 21, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants