-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unnatural sort order when plotting with ordered=FALSE #33
Comments
I am plagued by the same problem and I haven't found a solution so far. A fix or explanation would be really appreciated. |
I've found out that by giving the group.order parameter to the "plot" function solves the problem! |
I have the problem, that I don't get a sorted plot (your image 1), but always this unsorted thing (picture 2). I found out that this happens, if at least one item does not have data for all its levels. Lets say item1 has levels "no", "maybe no", "maybe yes" and "yes", but in your data, people just checked "yes" and "no", and nobody said "maybe no". |
Fixed in the latest Github version. |
Hey there,
I'm trying to plot some likert scale items using likert.bar.plot. I use the function directly (instead of the generic plot function) because I don't want the variables to be sorted by the plot function (I've got the labels numbered and I'd like to keep this order).
Plotting with ordered=FALSE gives me kind of an unnatural sort order (see attachment). Instead of 1 ... 14 (like in the likert object) I get 9 ... 1, 14 ... 10.
Can you help me with this?
Thanks a lot for the support! Great package, by the way!
Jonas
ordered = TRUE (generic plot function)
ordered = FALSE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: