Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow relaxed localpart size verification #53

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 17, 2018
Merged

Conversation

jcbf
Copy link
Owner

@jcbf jcbf commented Jul 17, 2018

Mitigation for #52

@ghost ghost assigned jcbf Jul 17, 2018
@ghost ghost added the in progress label Jul 17, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #53 into master will decrease coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #53      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.25%   86.98%   -0.27%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         502      507       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          438      441       +3     
- Misses         64       66       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
smf-spf.c 86.98% <66.66%> (-0.27%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0dc862a...22a144e. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 17, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 87.135% when pulling 22a144e on jcbf/relaxed_localpart into 0dc862a on master.

@jcbf jcbf merged commit 3f69417 into master Jul 17, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Jul 17, 2018
@jcbf jcbf deleted the jcbf/relaxed_localpart branch July 17, 2020 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants