This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 25, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
Checks existence of node before getting SecurityGroups and Images #360
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7791b58
Checks existence of node before getting SecurityGroups and Images
danielestevez a79e560
Returns null image if node not found
danielestevez c24e690
Changes log message
danielestevez fee81c5
Fixes missing log message
danielestevez fe3a13b
Fixes log message again
danielestevez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ public Image apply(ResourceDefinition input) { | |
ResourceGroup resourceGroup = resourceGroupMap.getUnchecked(regionAndId.region()); | ||
|
||
VirtualMachine vm = api.getVirtualMachineApi(resourceGroup.name()).get(regionAndId.id()); | ||
if (vm == null) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same as above |
||
return null; | ||
} | ||
String storageAccountName = storageProfileToStorageAccountName.apply(vm.properties().storageProfile()); | ||
|
||
VMImage.Builder builder = VMImage.customImage().group(resourceGroup.name()).storage(storageAccountName) | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you use checkNotNull, maybe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say it is ok as-is? taht check would throw a NPE, but in this case an IAE makes more sense?