Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2018. It is now read-only.

Release jclouds-1.6.0 #1564

Closed
31 of 32 tasks
abayer opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 36 comments
Closed
31 of 32 tasks

Release jclouds-1.6.0 #1564

abayer opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 36 comments

Comments

@abayer
Copy link
Member

abayer commented Apr 24, 2013

release jclouds 1.6.0

Work to do:

  • jclouds
  • staging repo closed
  • staging repo verified
  • staging repo released
  • tags pushed
  • in maven central
  • jclouds-chef
  • staging repo closed
  • staging repo verified
  • staging repo released
  • tags pushed
  • in maven central
  • jclouds-karaf
  • staging repo closed
  • staging repo verified
  • staging repo released
  • tags pushed
  • in maven central
  • jclouds-cli
  • staging repo closed
  • staging repo verified
  • staging repo released
  • tags pushed
  • in maven central
  • jclouds-labs
  • staging repo closed
  • staging repo verified
  • staging repo released
  • tags pushed
  • in maven central
  • jclouds.github.com
  • release notes updated
  • installation guide updated to 1.6.0
  • jclouds-examples
  • examples updated to 1.6.0
  • communication
    • await maven central sync
    • write summary on blog.jclouds.org
    • tweet
    • email jclouds, jclouds-dev google group

Here are the release commands for jclouds:

mvn release:clean release:prepare -DreleaseVersion=1.6.0 -Dtag=jclouds-1.6.0 -DdevelopmentVersion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT -DpushChanges=false

mvn clean release:perform -DconnectionUrl=scm:git:file://`pwd`/.git -Dtag=jclouds-1.6.0 -Dgoals="deploy -DskipTests"

<close oss sonatype staging repository and test it, then release it> https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#stagingRepositories

git push
git push --tags
@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

staging repository for jclouds/jclouds closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-878/

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

tested with compute-basics, blobstore-basics, denominator (which tested 4 of our dns providers)

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

per @everett-toews the rax example SmokeTest runs 100%.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

released and pushed tags

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

NEXT STEP:
start releasing downstream repos

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

jclouds/jclouds in central y'all http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cjclouds

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-labs closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-893/

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-chef closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-895/

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and release them.

@iocanel
Copy link
Member

iocanel commented Apr 28, 2013

jclouds-labs has been built, using jclouds.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. In some
cases this produces invalid OSGi metadata.
I think that for now it breaks the joyent-cloudapi for jclouds-karaf, but
its possible it breaks other stuff too.

Ideally, we could recut jclouds-labs. If not we could just exclude the
broken features from jclouds-karaf.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Adrian Cole notifications@github.comwrote:

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and
release them.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17128094
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

No problem. Ill recut it.

On Sunday, April 28, 2013, Ioannis Canellos wrote:

jclouds-labs has been built, using jclouds.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. In some
cases this produces invalid OSGi metadata.
I think that for now it breaks the joyent-cloudapi for jclouds-karaf, but
its possible it breaks other stuff too.

Ideally, we could recut jclouds-labs. If not we could just exclude the
broken features from jclouds-karaf.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Adrian Cole <notifications@github.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'notifications@github.com');>>wrote:

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and
release them.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17128094>
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17133936
.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

there are still a number of problems in the jclouds-labs pom, some of which were addressed, yet didn't survive the nit storm on jclouds/jclouds-labs#27. I will spend up to an hour fixing these poms again starting.. now.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

eventhough i am fixing the labs poms, please do remove labs from karaf.

Karaf will likely go into ASF and it shouldn't have strict deps on things
that are in labs. As discussed prior, not all things in labs will make the
cut, so we should be conservative.

On Sunday, April 28, 2013, Ioannis Canellos wrote:

jclouds-labs has been built, using jclouds.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. In some
cases this produces invalid OSGi metadata.
I think that for now it breaks the joyent-cloudapi for jclouds-karaf, but
its possible it breaks other stuff too.

Ideally, we could recut jclouds-labs. If not we could just exclude the
broken features from jclouds-karaf.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Adrian Cole <notifications@github.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'notifications@github.com');>>wrote:

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and
release them.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17128094>
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17133936
.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

I'm working on fixing the karaf features, which are pretty badly broken. In the mean time, can someone please +1 the following?

jclouds/jclouds-labs#86
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-chef/pull/83

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

new staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-chef closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-941/

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

whoops, forgot labs openstack poms. can someone +1 jclouds/jclouds-labs#87

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

new staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-labs closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-944/

@nacx
Copy link
Member

nacx commented Apr 28, 2013

labs and chef repos verified with Abiquo and Hosted Chef

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

released repos and pushed tags for labs and chef

This was referenced Apr 28, 2013
@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

test results posted: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds.github.com/blob/master/documentation/releasenotes/1.6-tests.md

next steps: release karaf, cli; write release notes

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

here's a much more simplified version of release notes. please give feedback as soon as you can:

jclouds/legacy-jclouds.github.com#137

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

all components except karaf, cli are in maven central

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

blog http://blog.jclouds.org

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

examples updated thx to @abayer jclouds/jclouds-examples#34

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

conceding eventual consistency on karaf and cli, this was the most efficient jclouds release I can remember. Thanks for the help folks!

@iocanel
Copy link
Member

iocanel commented Apr 29, 2013

jclouds-karaf: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-980/

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Adrian Cole notifications@github.comwrote:

conceding eventual consistency on karaf and cli, this was the most
efficient jclouds release I can remember. Thanks for the help folks!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17147599
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

@iocanel
Copy link
Member

iocanel commented Apr 29, 2013

jclouds-cli: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-984/

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ioannis Canellos iocanel@gmail.comwrote:

jclouds-karaf:
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-980/

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Adrian Cole notifications@github.comwrote:

conceding eventual consistency on karaf and cli, this was the most
efficient jclouds release I can remember. Thanks for the help folks!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17147599
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

@demobox
Copy link
Member

demobox commented Apr 29, 2013

@adriancole I can't seem to find a separate issue for the labs release - in that case, can we close jclouds/jclouds-labs#76, jclouds/jclouds-labs#57 and jclouds/jclouds-labs#46?

Also, it looks like the labs aggregator POM is still pointing to jclouds.version 1.6.0 - is that intentional or should that be bumped up to 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT to match the jclouds 1.6.x branch?

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

@demobox yeah the version should be bumped and there was no labs release
issue

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Andrew Phillips
notifications@github.comwrote:

@adriancole https://github.com/adriancole I can't seem to find a
separate issue for the labs release - in that case, can we close
jclouds/jclouds-labs#76jclouds/jclouds-labs#76,
jclouds/jclouds-labs#57https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/issues/57and
jclouds/jclouds-labs#46jclouds/jclouds-labs#46
?

Also, it looks like the labs aggregator POMhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/1.6.x/pom.xml#L43is still pointing to
jclouds.version 1.6.0 - is that intentional or should that be bumped up
to 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT to match the jclouds 1.6.x branchhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/1.6.x/project/pom.xml#L31
?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17167366
.

@demobox
Copy link
Member

demobox commented Apr 29, 2013

@demobox yeah the version should be bumped and there was no labs release issue

jclouds/jclouds-labs#95

@demobox
Copy link
Member

demobox commented Apr 29, 2013

@adriancole Good to close the open labs release issues for rc.3, 4 and 5?

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

Yes

On Monday, April 29, 2013, Andrew Phillips wrote:

@adriancole https://github.com/adriancole Good to close the open labs
release issues for rc.3, 4 and 5?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17171416
.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

tested cli by destroying some nodes I left running; released the karaf and cli repos.

@iocanel can you push tags when you get a chance?

@demobox
Copy link
Member

demobox commented May 7, 2013

Kara and CLI in Maven Central. Thanks, @iocanel !

@adriancole CLI and Karaf tags pushed. Good to close this issue?

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

aye cap'n

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Phillips notifications@github.comwrote:

Karahttp://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jclouds/karaf/jclouds-karaf/1.6.0/and
CLI http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jclouds/cli/jclouds-cli/ in Maven
Central. Thanks, @iocanel https://github.com/iocanel !

@adriancole https://github.com/adriancole CLIhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/commits/jclouds-cli-1.6.0and
Karaf https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/tree/jclouds-karaf-1.6.0tags pushed. Good to close this issue?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17517454
.

@demobox
Copy link
Member

demobox commented May 7, 2013

Goodbye GitHub issues! Thanks for fun times!

@demobox demobox closed this as completed May 7, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants