Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update require-inject to version 1.4.0 πŸš€ #91

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 4, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

require-inject just published its new version 1.4.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of require-inject – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 6 commits .

  • a4803ca 1.4.0
  • bd9a1d8 Changelog for 1.4.0
  • a1887d0 Cleanup the w/o cache interface
  • 547c07b Tacksify inject-paths test so that it works w/o fixtures
  • fe86792 Add support for loading modules to inject deps into w/ a clear cache
  • 649ba67 Move to standard for source formatting

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 4, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 13cd632 on greenkeeper-require-inject-1.4.0 into 6a1e985 on master.

@jcollado jcollado force-pushed the greenkeeper-require-inject-1.4.0 branch from 13cd632 to fd0a9dc Compare June 4, 2016 06:49
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 4, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling fd0a9dc on greenkeeper-require-inject-1.4.0 into 33a11d5 on master.

@jcollado jcollado merged commit 3fd7e94 into master Jun 4, 2016
@jcollado jcollado deleted the greenkeeper-require-inject-1.4.0 branch June 4, 2016 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants