You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
mousseinov opened this issue
Dec 31, 2018
· 3 comments
Labels
cosmeticCosmetic issue (spelling, grammar, etc.)errorTechnical error requiring correctionfixedFixed in Jeff's working copy. (Issue remains open until next revision posted to github.)multipleMultiple issues in one report
page 114, section 3.8: In the pseudo code recurrence relation at the bottom of the page for subset sum modified for avoiding the case when t is negative, it says SS(i, t) = SS(i + 1, t) when t > X[i] in the third case, for that case wouldn't it be valid when t < X[i] rather than t > X[i], as that would make the t that is being passed in negative when doing SS(i, t - X[i]) which would automatically yield a False.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, yeah I meant to say the recurrence relation, not the pseudo code. Thank you!
mousseinov
changed the title
Possible pseudocode error in Subset Sum: Ch. 3 section 8 pg. 114
Possible ~~pseudocode~~ recurrence relation error in Subset Sum: Ch. 3 section 8 pg. 114
Dec 31, 2018
mousseinov
changed the title
Possible ~~pseudocode~~ recurrence relation error in Subset Sum: Ch. 3 section 8 pg. 114
Possible ~pseudocode~ recurrence relation error in Subset Sum: Ch. 3 section 8 pg. 114
Dec 31, 2018
mousseinov
changed the title
Possible ~pseudocode~ recurrence relation error in Subset Sum: Ch. 3 section 8 pg. 114
Possible recurrence relation error in Subset Sum: Ch. 3 section 8 pg. 114
Dec 31, 2018
cosmeticCosmetic issue (spelling, grammar, etc.)errorTechnical error requiring correctionfixedFixed in Jeff's working copy. (Issue remains open until next revision posted to github.)multipleMultiple issues in one report
page 114, section 3.8: In the
pseudo coderecurrence relation at the bottom of the page for subset sum modified for avoiding the case when t is negative, it says SS(i, t) = SS(i + 1, t) when t > X[i] in the third case, for that case wouldn't it be valid when t < X[i] rather than t > X[i], as that would make the t that is being passed in negative when doing SS(i, t - X[i]) which would automatically yield a False.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: