Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove support for Ruby 2.3.x #7453

Closed
mattr- opened this issue Jan 3, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7454
Closed

Remove support for Ruby 2.3.x #7453

mattr- opened this issue Jan 3, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7454
Labels
feature frozen-due-to-age has-pull-request Somebody suggested a solution to fix this issue
Milestone

Comments

@mattr-
Copy link
Member

mattr- commented Jan 3, 2019

Summary

Remove explicit support for Ruby 2.3. If it continues to work as part of the 4.x release series, that's great. When Ruby 2.3 stops working with the 4.x series, then we've got a policy in place that says we don't support it.

Motivation

Ruby 2.3 will be end of life on 2019-03-31. I want to be ahead of the game and stop supporting a version that won't be supported upstream earlier than upstream drops support for it.

@mattr- mattr- added the feature label Jan 3, 2019
@mattr- mattr- added this to the 4.0 milestone Jan 3, 2019
@mattr- mattr- added this to Confirmed in Jekyll 4.1 Jan 3, 2019
@DirtyF DirtyF pinned this issue Jan 3, 2019
@jekyllbot jekyllbot added the has-pull-request Somebody suggested a solution to fix this issue label Jan 3, 2019
@mattr- mattr- moved this from Confirmed to In progress in Jekyll 4.1 Jan 8, 2019
@DirtyF DirtyF removed this from In progress in Jekyll 4.1 Jan 27, 2019
@ashmaroli ashmaroli unpinned this issue Mar 16, 2019
@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 14, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature frozen-due-to-age has-pull-request Somebody suggested a solution to fix this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants