Use System.Text.Json api for databases #1854
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cvium
reviewed
Oct 8, 2019
|
Is the new serializer configurable per class? I remember there being a few instances of snake case. |
cvium
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2019
|
@cvium It is, take a look at the |
JustAMan
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
System.Text.Jsonand is faster in my tests than the current json serializer. Mostly because doesn't need to convert to UTF-16 and can operate directly on theReadonlySpan<byte>returned by the SQlite wrapper.