Upgrade BDInfo plugin to UHD/Atmos/DTS:X support

[stanionascu]

For playback of 1:1 backups via jellyfin, it is required to support not only normal BluRay BDMV folder(s) but also UHD-BD folders. It also keeps the DiscUtils dependency from upstream, so that media info from ISO backups could be extracted.

To make it easier to port later on, the changes from upstream UniqProject/BDInfo are kept to bare minimum. Hence a lot of reverted "fixes".

Changes

• Import latest BDInfo changes from https://github.com/UniqProject/BDInfo
• Adds support for UHD-BD BDMV folders streaming
• Keeps ISO DiscUtils support from upstream.

Issues
N/A

[JustAMan]

Our current idea is to use as much 3rd party code as possible without including the source.
Can you update the code by removing BDInfo source and instead adding a NuGet dependency on that?

[stanionascu]

Makes sense. I'll give it a try.

[KerryRJ]

I would like to know what is meant by "adding a NuGet dependency on that"?
Are you referring to using an upstream UniqProject/BDInfo package, that does not seem to exist?

[dkanada]

He probably means use the BDInfo library from NuGet instead of committing it here.

[KerryRJ]

The only BdInfo Nuget package that I can see in Nuget is the Emby package. Is there another one?

[stanionascu]

The only BdInfo Nuget package that I can see in Nuget is the Emby package. Is there another one?

I already started looking into creating the Nuget package for the updated BDInfo, but it will still require modifications on top, due to usage of FileSystemMetadata

[stanionascu]

I've stripped out BDInfo into a separate library and published it to nuget repo. It worked just fine with the original UI, but I haven't tested it fully with jellyfin yet.

[JustAMan]

Mostly looks good.

What package targets did you publish on Nuget? Got a link?

[JustAMan]

Thanks for cleaning this!

[anthonylavado]

Okay, for reference @stanionascu has created this NuGet Package here: https://www.nuget.org/packages/BDInfo/0.7.6.1

[anthonylavado]

@stanionascu Are you open to transferring the package to us in the Jellyfin organization?

[stanionascu]

@stanionascu Are you open to transferring the package to us in the Jellyfin organization?

Sure. I have no problem with that.

[JustAMan]

Do you want to transfer your repo, or want us to fork yours?

[stanionascu]

Do you want to transfer your repo, or want us to fork yours?

I'm fine with transferring.

[anthonylavado]

@stanionascu If you go in to the settings, and transfer it to me, I can then transfer it to the organization.

On NuGet, if you go to "Manage Package", you can add "Jellyfin" as an owner. If that doesn't work, add "anthonylavado" as an owner instead.

[stanionascu]

@stanionascu If you go in to the settings, and transfer it to me, I can then transfer it to the organization.

On NuGet, if you go to "Manage Package", you can add "Jellyfin" as an owner. If that doesn't work, add "anthonylavado" as an owner instead.

I've added Jellyfin as nuget package owner, but I can't transfer the ownership due to missing write permissions to the repos. Feel free to fork it instead.

[anthonylavado]

Repo has been forked and added to the org. Package transfer on NuGet.org complete.

[EraYaN]

We might want to unlink the fork relation if we want search on the repo. (Or ask support to do it)

[anthonylavado]

We might want to unlink the fork relation if we want search on the repo. (Or ask support to do it)

@EraYaN I can ask support to do it. I don’t think you can do it manually.