Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remarks to manual v4.3.0 #425

Closed
RalfHerzog opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Remarks to manual v4.3.0 #425

RalfHerzog opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@RalfHerzog
Copy link

Hi. I finished reading through your manual completely. It is written very well, but I found a few places which are unclear to me.

Page 18
For "Multi-point crossover" you show an example for the crossover at the indexes 1 and 4. Unfortunately I cannot see the use in the figure 1.3.10. Why are there 4 chromosome images instead of three (one for the initial chromosome and two for the recombination). How did they work?

Page 25
I think I found a typo at "This limited Engines no long creates [...]". Shouldn't it be "This limited Engines no longer creates [...]"?

Page 29
I think I found a typo at "[...] you have alive view on the evolution progress.". Do you mean "a live"?

Page 88
The "Pareto dominance" is defined as "[...] iff u is partially less than v, [...]" but in the following term (starting with "i.e.") only greater (or equal) than is used. Does the definition with "less" fit the term, since u_i must be greater than v_i for one or multiple "i"?

Page 92
Between the black lines you start with "Since the MOO classes [...]" but "MOO" (Multi-objective optimization) was never defined before, only MOP was.

@jenetics jenetics self-assigned this Nov 8, 2018
@jenetics jenetics added this to the v4.4.0 milestone Nov 8, 2018
@jenetics
Copy link
Owner

jenetics commented Nov 8, 2018

Thank you, I will have a look.

@jenetics
Copy link
Owner

Page 18
There is a slight mismatch between the description and the figures. What the figures shows is the original chromosomes selected for crossover and the crossover result for different indices. I clarified this, in the text and the images.

Page 25
You are right, has been fixed.

Page 29
Right, has been fixed.

Page 88
You are also right here. I took the definition as referenced and forgot to change this. In the literature Pareto dominance is defined with less, but the default for the optimization direction in Jenetics is greater. So I had to adapt the definition, to be consistent with the library. Otherwise the MOO would have a different optimization default.

Page 92
Also correct at this point. Has been clarified.

Thank you again for the careful reading of the manual!

@jenetics
Copy link
Owner

Merged into r4.4.0 branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants