Remove obsolete paths as workaround for INFRA-905 #11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Removing old paths makes things more secure, rather than less secure, so sounds reasonable to me, if JFrog don't have a solution. |
|
Shouldn't really matter all that much from a security POV, and may prevent something like maintenance branch releases using the 'obsolete' pattern. Extremely unlikely, admittedly, but who knows… |
|
👍 good idea to avoid mistakes. It's so easy to fix if necessary that it's worth doing indeed. |
|
JFrog support was unable to offer a workaround. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Artifactory appears to have a limit of probably (undocumented) 1024 chars (Office-365-Connector had 1026 chars in its
includePattern, the other affected ones were all longer than that).Keeps the most recently used path/groupId for a given artifact.
To be merged only if JFrog support has no better solution. Or maybe even then. Do we want to prune obsolete paths?