Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix redirect link #5516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2021
Merged

Fix redirect link #5516

merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2021

Conversation

daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

Amends #2756. Noticed during development of #5515.

Proposed changelog entries

(too minor)

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • (If applicable) Jira issue is well described
  • Changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developer, depending on the change). Examples
    • Fill-in the Proposed changelog entries section only if there are breaking changes or other changes which may require extra steps from users during the upgrade
  • Appropriate autotests or explanation to why this change has no tests
  • For dependency updates: links to external changelogs and, if possible, full diffs

Desired reviewers

@mention

Maintainer checklist

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

  • There are at least 2 approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change
  • Conversations in the pull request are over OR it is explicit that a reviewer does not block the change
  • Changelog entries in the PR title and/or Proposed changelog entries are correct
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the PR title. (example)
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

Copy link
Member

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it also be prefixed with www.?

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member Author

daniel-beck commented May 25, 2021

Should it also be prefixed with www.?

Yes, I will clean this up in whichever PR is merged last.

@timja timja added ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback skip-changelog Should not be shown in the changelog labels May 25, 2021
@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented May 25, 2021

This PR is now ready for merge, after ~24 hours, we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@timja timja removed the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label May 25, 2021
@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented May 25, 2021

conflicts 😂

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member Author

🤷 as expected.

@timja timja added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label May 25, 2021
@timja timja merged commit 1205876 into jenkinsci:master May 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback skip-changelog Should not be shown in the changelog
Projects
None yet
3 participants