Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backporting for LTS 2.319.3 (additional backports) #6235

Conversation

imonteroperez
Copy link
Contributor

@imonteroperez imonteroperez commented Jan 31, 2022

Follow up from: #6187

Fixed
-----

JENKINS-67702		Minor     		Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:26:06 +0000
	Backport XStream 1.4.19 to LTS
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67702

JENKINS-67635		Major     		2.333
	Using "||" in pipeline targeting cloud labels cause multiple agents to be spun incessantly
	regression
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67635

JENKINS-67470		Major     		2.329 released Jan 11, 2022
	ClassNotFoundException when using service as part of SCM poll
	regression
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67470

Candidates
----------

JENKINS-67702		Minor     		Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:26:06 +0000
	Backport XStream 1.4.19 to LTS
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67702

JENKINS-67496		Major     		2.333
	Drag & drop is messed up, drag placeholders always have tiny size
	regression
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67496

JENKINS-67627		Minor     		2.333
	Expandable text areas strip spaces
	regression
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67627

JENKINS-67662		Minor     		2.333
	Tooltips show wrong feature name on checkboxes
	regression
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67662

JENKINS-67635		Major     		2.333
	Using "||" in pipeline targeting cloud labels cause multiple agents to be spun incessantly
	regression
	https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67635

@jtnord
Copy link
Member

jtnord commented Jan 31, 2022

seems somewhat strange to me to have so many issues backported that are not even in a weekly release.
how much confidence do we have with the fixes, and that they do not introduce regressions?

onChoose: function (event) {
const draggableDiv = event.item;
const height = draggableDiv.clientHeight;
draggableDiv.style.height = `${height}px`;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not compatible with IE 11 as is, this LTS line still supports it so would need to be adjusted like so:

Suggested change
draggableDiv.style.height = `${height}px`;
draggableDiv.style.height = height + 'px';

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Jan 31, 2022

seems somewhat strange to me to have so many issues backported that are not even in a weekly release. how much confidence do we have with the fixes, and that they do not introduce regressions?

they look generally low risk to me but I don't see a rush in backporting them, most of them can be backported to the next LTS line.

+1 on JENKINS-67635 though

and JENKINS-67702 is probably fine too

@imonteroperez imonteroperez force-pushed the towards-2.319.3-additional-backports branch from c392147 to ab95dd7 Compare January 31, 2022 11:50
@imonteroperez imonteroperez marked this pull request as draft January 31, 2022 11:50
@timja timja added the into-lts This PR is filed against an LTS branch label Jan 31, 2022
Bumps [xstream](https://github.com/x-stream/xstream) from 1.4.18 to 1.4.19.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit 79e27f0)
@imonteroperez imonteroperez marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2022 12:25
Copy link
Contributor

@Wadeck Wadeck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to be fine, not manually tested :)

Copy link
Member

@daniel-beck daniel-beck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks reasonably scoped for a late backport. The candidates can wait until later.

@imonteroperez imonteroperez merged commit 9979736 into jenkinsci:stable-2.319 Feb 2, 2022
@imonteroperez imonteroperez mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2022
34 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
into-lts This PR is filed against an LTS branch
Projects
None yet
6 participants