[JENKINS-72240] Add top level license declarations #50
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-72240 notes that the plugin does not declare the license in its pom.xml or in a LICENSE file. Many of the source files include an MIT license header. No other license is visible in the source files, except MIT license, so it seems safe to declare the plugin as using the MIT license. Dates in the copyright notice were extracted from the git commits and the license headings added to source files.
|
@ikedam or @omer727 would you be willing to review and merge this pull request to resolve JENKINS-72240? |
ikedam
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[JENKINS-72240] Add top level license declarations
JENKINS-72240 notes that the plugin does not declare the license in its pom.xml or in a LICENSE file. Many of the source files include an MIT license header. No other license is visible in the source files, except MIT license, so it seems safe to declare the plugin as using the MIT license.
Dates in the copyright notice were extracted from the git commits and the license headings added to source files.
Testing done
Reviewed git history of the license headings that exist in the files to confirm their date ranges.
Submitter checklist