Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Disable Source NAT Port Randomization #458

Closed
arjenvri opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #486
Closed

Feature request: Disable Source NAT Port Randomization #458

arjenvri opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #486
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@arjenvri
Copy link
Contributor

Would it be possible to support disabling port randomization for source NAT?

set security nat source port-randomization disable

thank you so much!

reference
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/nat/topics/ref/statement/security-edit-port-randomization.html

@arjenvri arjenvri added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 16, 2023
@jeremmfr jeremmfr added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Apr 20, 2023
@jeremmfr jeremmfr self-assigned this Apr 20, 2023
@jeremmfr
Copy link
Owner

I will take care of adding this.

jeremmfr added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2023
to declare static configuration in "security nat source"
Fix #458
jeremmfr added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2023
to declare static configuration in "security nat source"
Fix #458
jeremmfr added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2023
to declare static configuration in "security nat source"
Fix #458
jeremmfr added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2023
to declare static configuration in "security nat source"
Fix #458
jeremmfr added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2023
to declare static configuration in "security nat source"
Fix #458
jeremmfr added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2023
to declare static configuration in "security nat source"
Fix #458
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants