Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jackson-databind False Negative #1127

Closed
stboissdev opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

jackson-databind False Negative #1127

stboissdev opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@stboissdev
Copy link

False negative on library

<dependency>
    <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
    <artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
    <version>2.9.2</version>
</dependency>

the CVE-2018-5968 affect version 2.8.11 and 2.9.x through 2.9.3

@tkep
Copy link

tkep commented Mar 6, 2018

Same false negative issue with databind mircofix 2.7.9.3

<suppress>
    <!-- databind micro fix 2.7.9.3 is the official fix for the CVEs -->
    <notes><![CDATA[
      file name: jackson-databind-2.7.9.3.jar
      ]]></notes>
    <cve>CVE-2017-17485</cve>
    <cve>CVE-2018-5968</cve>
</suppress>

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/releases/tag/jackson-databind-2.7.9.3

see https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/541652/100/0/threaded

@Brcrwilliams
Copy link

Brcrwilliams commented Mar 6, 2018

It seems that the CVE has not been associated with the CPE's for 2.9.x: link

Edit - Jackson databind is missing CPEs for the following versions:

  • 2.8.10
  • 2.8.11
  • 2.8.11.1
  • 2.9.0 through 2.9.4

I have contacted NIST about adding these CPEs.

@jeremylong
Copy link
Owner

This may also be due to the data in the XML data feeds as opposed to the JSON data feeds. See #1088.

Thanks for the report and I'll try to get to this soon.

@jeremylong jeremylong added the bug label Mar 9, 2018
@jeremylong
Copy link
Owner

This was resolved with 6.x

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants