You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear developers, I have a brief question after running megahit I run prodigal for all my metagenomic samples (using the -meta flag) for using them in other analyses.
Should I use the prodigal output instead of the initial output of megahit? Would this improve or acsellerate the estimation? I noticed in the publication that you used Prodigal to corroborate the results (and I will use blastn to assess the taxonomy of the contigs identified by VirFinder).
Thanks for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear developers, I have a brief question after running megahit I run prodigal for all my metagenomic samples (using the -meta flag) for using them in other analyses.
Should I use the prodigal output instead of the initial output of megahit? Would this improve or acsellerate the estimation? I noticed in the publication that you used Prodigal to corroborate the results (and I will use blastn to assess the taxonomy of the contigs identified by VirFinder).
Thanks for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: