Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Support class instances in .toHaveProperty() matcher #5367

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 22, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,13 +2,15 @@

### features

* `[jest-mock]` Add util methods to create async functions.
([#5318](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/5318))
* `[jest-mock]` Add util methods to create async functions.
([#5318](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/5318))

### Fixes

* `[jest]` Add `import-local` to `jest` package.
([#5353](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/5353))
* `[expect]` Support class instances in `.toHaveProperty()` matcher.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This also affected .toMatchObject() as far as I can tell.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in a good or bad way?

Copy link
Contributor

@eps1lon eps1lon Mar 2, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In a very good way. It basically enables .toMatchObject() to check if a given class implements an interface.

But in my opinion this should be included in the changelog regardless of whether one finds the change good or bad.

Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB Mar 2, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was more in the vein of "is this a regression we have to fix or not?". Good that it's not!

PR welcome to expand the changelog entry 🙂

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I include some tests just to make sure I identified that behavior correctly?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be awesome!

([#5367](https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/5367))

## jest 22.1.4

Expand Down
58 changes: 58 additions & 0 deletions packages/expect/src/__tests__/__snapshots__/matchers.test.js.snap
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2778,6 +2778,23 @@ To have a nested property:
"
`;

exports[`.toHaveProperty() {pass: false} expect({}).toHaveProperty('a', "a") 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>object</><dim>).toHaveProperty(</><green>path</>, <green>value</><dim>)</>

Expected the object:
<red>{}</>
To have a nested property:
<green>\\"a\\"</>
With a value of:
<green>\\"a\\"</>
Received:
<red>undefined</>

Difference:

Comparing two different types of values. Expected <green>string</> but received <red>undefined</>."
`;

exports[`.toHaveProperty() {pass: false} expect({}).toHaveProperty('a', "test") 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>object</><dim>).toHaveProperty(</><green>path</>, <green>value</><dim>)</>

Expand All @@ -2790,6 +2807,23 @@ With a value of:
"
`;

exports[`.toHaveProperty() {pass: false} expect({}).toHaveProperty('b', undefined) 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>object</><dim>).toHaveProperty(</><green>path</>, <green>value</><dim>)</>

Expected the object:
<red>{}</>
To have a nested property:
<green>\\"b\\"</>
With a value of:
<green>undefined</>
Received:
<red>\\"b\\"</>

Difference:

Comparing two different types of values. Expected <green>undefined</> but received <red>string</>."
`;

exports[`.toHaveProperty() {pass: false} expect(1).toHaveProperty('a.b.c') 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>object</><dim>).toHaveProperty(</><green>path</><dim>)</>

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2968,6 +3002,30 @@ With a value of:
"
`;

exports[`.toHaveProperty() {pass: true} expect({}).toHaveProperty('a', undefined) 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>object</><dim>).not.toHaveProperty(</><green>path</>, <green>value</><dim>)</>

Expected the object:
<red>{}</>
Not to have a nested property:
<green>\\"a\\"</>
With a value of:
<green>undefined</>
"
`;

exports[`.toHaveProperty() {pass: true} expect({}).toHaveProperty('b', "b") 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>object</><dim>).not.toHaveProperty(</><green>path</>, <green>value</><dim>)</>

Expected the object:
<red>{}</>
Not to have a nested property:
<green>\\"b\\"</>
With a value of:
<green>\\"b\\"</>
"
`;

exports[`.toMatch() {pass: true} expect(Foo bar).toMatch(/^foo/i) 1`] = `
"<dim>expect(</><red>received</><dim>).not.toMatch(</><green>expected</><dim>)</>

Expand Down
13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions packages/expect/src/__tests__/matchers.test.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -749,6 +749,15 @@ describe('.toHaveLength', () => {
});

describe('.toHaveProperty()', () => {
class Foo {
get a() {
return undefined;
}
get b() {
return 'b';
}
}

[
[{a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}}, 'a.b.c.d', 1],
[{a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}}, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], 1],
Expand All @@ -758,6 +767,8 @@ describe('.toHaveProperty()', () => {
[{a: {b: undefined}}, 'a.b', undefined],
[{a: {b: {c: 5}}}, 'a.b', {c: 5}],
[Object.assign(Object.create(null), {property: 1}), 'property', 1],
[new Foo(), 'a', undefined],
[new Foo(), 'b', 'b'],
].forEach(([obj, keyPath, value]) => {
test(`{pass: true} expect(${stringify(
obj,
Expand All @@ -782,6 +793,8 @@ describe('.toHaveProperty()', () => {
[1, 'a.b.c', 'test'],
['abc', 'a.b.c', {a: 5}],
[{a: {b: {c: 5}}}, 'a.b', {c: 4}],
[new Foo(), 'a', 'a'],
[new Foo(), 'b', undefined],
].forEach(([obj, keyPath, value]) => {
test(`{pass: false} expect(${stringify(
obj,
Expand Down
27 changes: 26 additions & 1 deletion packages/expect/src/__tests__/utils.test.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,6 +46,30 @@ describe('getPath()', () => {
});
});

test('property is a getter on class instance', () => {
class A {
get a() {
return 'a';
}
get b() {
return {c: 'c'};
}
}

expect(getPath(new A(), 'a')).toEqual({
hasEndProp: true,
lastTraversedObject: new A(),
traversedPath: ['a'],
value: 'a',
});
expect(getPath(new A(), 'b.c')).toEqual({
hasEndProp: true,
lastTraversedObject: {c: 'c'},
traversedPath: ['b', 'c'],
value: 'c',
});
});

test('path breaks', () => {
expect(getPath({a: {}}, 'a.b.c')).toEqual({
hasEndProp: false,
Expand All @@ -55,11 +79,12 @@ describe('getPath()', () => {
});
});

test('empry object at the end', () => {
test('empty object at the end', () => {
expect(getPath({a: {b: {c: {}}}}, 'a.b.c.d')).toEqual({
hasEndProp: false,
lastTraversedObject: {},
traversedPath: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
value: undefined,
});
});
});
Expand Down
48 changes: 27 additions & 21 deletions packages/expect/src/utils.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ type GetPath = {
};

export const hasOwnProperty = (object: Object, value: string) =>
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, value);
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object, value) ||
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(object.constructor.prototype, value);

export const getPath = (
object: Object,
Expand All @@ -27,40 +28,45 @@ export const getPath = (
propertyPath = propertyPath.split('.');
}

const lastProp = propertyPath.length === 1;

if (propertyPath.length) {
const lastProp = propertyPath.length === 1;
const prop = propertyPath[0];
const newObject = object[prop];

if (!lastProp && (newObject === null || newObject === undefined)) {
// This is not the last prop in the chain. If we keep recursing it will
// hit a `can't access property X of undefined | null`. At this point we
// know that the chain broken and we return right away.
// know that the chain has broken and we can return right away.
return {
hasEndProp: false,
lastTraversedObject: object,
traversedPath: [],
};
} else {
const result = getPath(newObject, propertyPath.slice(1));
result.lastTraversedObject || (result.lastTraversedObject = object);
result.traversedPath.unshift(prop);
if (propertyPath.length === 1) {
result.hasEndProp = hasOwnProperty(object, prop);
if (!result.hasEndProp) {
delete result.value;
result.traversedPath.shift();
}
}

const result = getPath(newObject, propertyPath.slice(1));

if (result.lastTraversedObject === null) {
result.lastTraversedObject = object;
}

result.traversedPath.unshift(prop);

if (lastProp) {
result.hasEndProp = hasOwnProperty(object, prop);
if (!result.hasEndProp) {
result.traversedPath.shift();
}
return result;
}
} else {
return {
lastTraversedObject: null,
traversedPath: [],
value: object,
};

return result;
}

return {
lastTraversedObject: null,
traversedPath: [],
value: object,
};
};

// Strip properties from object that are not present in the subset. Useful for
Expand Down