Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add notice to the document that mount point should be a drive #51

Closed
korokoro opened this issue Jul 26, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Add notice to the document that mount point should be a drive #51

korokoro opened this issue Jul 26, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@korokoro
Copy link

Hi,

The documentation of the older encfs4win[1] describes the following problem:

launch "encfs <crypt_dir> <plain_dir>" where crypt_dir is crypted directory while plain_dir is the directory where you can access not crypted files.
NOTE: Windows 7 users should use a drive (like "X:") as plain_dir to avoid case sensitive problems which results in file/folder not found problems.

[1] http://members.ferrara.linux.it/freddy77/encfs.html

I found that this is still true in the current version of encfs4win. (I tested with 1.10.1-RC7 on Win 7/10 32bit)
I would suggest to add notice about this problem to README. It should be helpful for new users.

I would also suggest to make encfs show a warning if plain_dir is not a drive (or make encfs refuse any plain_dir which is not a drive.)

Thanks,

@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented Jul 26, 2016

Hi @korokoro -- We're trying to figure out a way to fix this issue so that it isn't necessary to mount to a drive letter anymore, and have a bug report out on Dokany regarding this.

If we can't fix this before the next release, however, then we will definitely add this to the documentation and program!

@jetwhiz jetwhiz self-assigned this Jul 26, 2016
@jetwhiz jetwhiz added this to the 1.10.1 milestone Jul 26, 2016
@korokoro
Copy link
Author

@jetwhiz, thank you for your quick reply.
I'm happy to hear that and I hope the problem could be fixed. :D

jetwhiz added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2016
Dokany v1.0.0-stable does not offer a fix for this
  Wait for potential fix in next release
@Owyn
Copy link

Owyn commented Nov 24, 2016

Is there a fix possible for this? 😿

@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented Nov 25, 2016

@Owyn -- the only quick-fix I've been able to think of would be to have an option to force all directory/file names to be all uppercase. Such an option would break compatability with encfs upstream, though, and I don't think that the encfs project will be willing to implement this type of quick fix in the main project.

As of right now it is still a mystery why Windows/Dokany converts everything to uppercase when directory junctions are used.

@Owyn
Copy link

Owyn commented Nov 26, 2016

why Windows/Dokany converts everything to uppercase when directory junctions are used.

it seems I cannot reproduce the problem, all 800 gb and 200,000 of files of mixed uppercase\undercase are OK for me, all found, all have their own names.

@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented Nov 26, 2016

@Owyn -- if you're using Block32 filename encoding, then this issue might not exist with --reverse mode enabled if you're using a directory junction on the mount point.

@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented Aug 16, 2018

It appears that this may have been fixed in the latest update of Windows 10 (see dokan-dev/dokany#293). I need to test this out and see if it has been fixed for encfs4win (and if this fix is also on Win8/7).

@jetwhiz jetwhiz moved this from TODO to In Progress in v1.11.0 Release Jan 24, 2019
@jetwhiz jetwhiz moved this from In Progress to Done in v1.11.0 Release Jan 27, 2019
@jetwhiz jetwhiz added the fixed label Jan 31, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 4, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label May 4, 2019
@jetwhiz jetwhiz closed this as completed May 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants