Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WMRB on Serial Predictions #45

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 10, 2018
Merged

WMRB on Serial Predictions #45

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 10, 2018

Conversation

jfkirk
Copy link
Owner

@jfkirk jfkirk commented Mar 9, 2018

Increases efficiency of WMRB (or any sample-based loss) by allowing it to function on a serial prediction of sampled items, rather than sampling from a dense prediction of all items.

self.tf_learning_rate = tf.placeholder('float', None)
self.tf_alpha = tf.placeholder('float', None)
self.tf_sampled_item_indices = tf.placeholder('int64', [None, None])

# from nose.tools import set_trace;set_trace()
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note: remove

'tf_rankings': self.tf_rankings,
})
if self.loss_graph_factory.is_sample_based:
tf_sample_predictions = gather_sampled_item_predictions(
tf_prediction=self.tf_prediction, tf_sampled_item_indices=self.tf_sampled_item_indices
tf_sample_predictions = densify_sampled_item_predictions(
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: should rename one of these tf_sample_predictions

@jfkirk jfkirk merged commit fa1b9af into master Mar 10, 2018
@jfkirk jfkirk deleted the wmrb-fix branch March 10, 2018 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant