You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When generating a table with footnotes, and rendering it as PDF, the footnote references are rendered but the footnotes themselves are missing. Example:
% Testing
---------- ------- --------------------------------------------------------
Multiplier Priority Description
Value
---------- ------- --------------------------------------------------------
0 0 Core Node[^1]
1 4096 Redundant Core Nodes[^1]
2 8192 Reserved
3 12288 **Building Backbone**
4 16384 **Redundant Building Backbones**
5 20480 Secondary Backbone[^2]
6 24576 **Access Switches**[^3]
7 28672 Access Switches[^4]
8 32768 Default[^5]
---------- ------- ----------- -------------------------------------------
Table: Priority Table
[^1]: The core switches/routers will not be
participating in STP... reserved in case they ever are
[^2]: This is for building complexes, where
there are separate building (secondary)
backbones that terminate at the complex
backbone.
[^3]: This is the normal edge-device priority
[^4]: Used for access switches that are
daisy-changed from another access switch.
We're using this terminology instead of
"aggregation switch" because it's hard to
define when a switch stops being an
access switch and becomes an
aggregation switch.
[^5]: No managed network devices should have this priority.
When generating a table with footnotes, and rendering it as PDF, the footnote references are rendered but the footnotes themselves are missing. Example:
Rendered at http://psg.com/~brian/pandoc-table-sample2.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: