Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rem instead of em or px #5

Closed
SimonTernoir opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

rem instead of em or px #5

SimonTernoir opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@SimonTernoir
Copy link

Hi!
Any thoughts on using rem instead of em or px for units in your framework?

Thanks,

@daralthus
Copy link

👍

@mschinis
Copy link
Contributor

👍 on this

@jgthms
Copy link
Owner

jgthms commented Jan 28, 2016

There are many reasons why I don't recommend using rem throughout your css. I designed Bulma around pixels and it will stay like this.

Plus, you can easily tweak the variables to adjust the size of all elements.

@jgthms jgthms added the wontfix label Jan 28, 2016
@jgthms jgthms closed this as completed Jan 28, 2016
@Cobertos
Copy link

Cobertos commented May 5, 2020

@jgthms
Is this still the case? It looks like this might have changed in the current version of Bulma?

Also the link you have pasted is broken, I was curious on what the reasoning was

@slashmili
Copy link

I also ended up here to understand why are we using rem in the Bulma. Maybe it deserves a page in the docs?

BTW @Cobertos you can find the archived version of page in https://web.archive.org/web/20160915192912/https://jgthms.com/in-css-use-pixels-not-em.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants