Fix gitinfo nature: it's a shared kernel, not a business context

[murdos]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e64fdf2) 100.00% compared to head (a10b4bb) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main     #8296   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity      2632      2632           
===========================================
  Files            686       686           
  Lines          11642     11642           
  Branches         253       253           
===========================================
  Hits           11642     11642           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pascalgrimaud]

By nature, agree it should be shared kernel. But like this, it won't be used somewhere else, as there is only 1 single configuration class.
Do you have something in mind?

[murdos]

By nature, agree it should be shared kernel. But like this, it won't be used somewhere else, as there is only 1 single configuration class. Do you have something in mind?

At work I'm generating living documentation using these annotations (including a context map using https://contextmapper.org/), and this package pops as a business context with the other real business contexts whereas it should not.

I agree that everything within the wire package is most of the time not a shared kernel: would you suggest to rather remove the package-info.java?

[pascalgrimaud]

No, I was curious :-)