Startup commands improvements

[murdos]

No description provided.

[renanfranca]

Thanks, Interesting improvements! I am going to take a closer look as it is an opportunity to learn 😊

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5eeaf7b) to head (88db277).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main     #9025   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
- Complexity      2880      2887    +7     
===========================================
  Files            729       731    +2     
  Lines          12514     12512    -2     
  Branches         256       256           
===========================================
- Hits           12514     12512    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[renanfranca]

@murdos : Thank you very much! 💙

This new switch features makes me want to use the interfaces instead of enums. There was a lot of stuffs going on at the interface StartupCommand:

• including the possibility to use supresswarning for sonar
• more than one "public" records in the same file which makes sense for me, but sometimes it isn't considere best practices by my co-works

I am going to use this approach at my next issue #8963 !

[murdos]

@renanfranca : thanks for the feedback! I've moved all implementations of StartupCommand to their own top-level file :)

[renanfranca]

@renanfranca : thanks for the feedback! I've moved all implementations of StartupCommand to their own top-level file :)

Nice! You are welcome 👍😁