You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current Python bindings work nicely, but have the limitation that are based on numpy which doesn't like nested ragged arrays, which is all what XCDF is.
A nice project specifically built to deal with this kind of arrays is awkward-array.
If we manage to add a binding interface based on this, then and XCDF file should be basically an awkward "table" (see scikit-hep/awkward#2597).
The only limitation wrt to astropy tables is the support of units which is still under development (see scikit-hep/awkward#2468).
The metadata (in XCDF the "comments" section) might be simply loaded as an array of awkward records.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current Python bindings work nicely, but have the limitation that are based on numpy which doesn't like nested ragged arrays, which is all what XCDF is.
A nice project specifically built to deal with this kind of arrays is awkward-array.
If we manage to add a binding interface based on this, then and XCDF file should be basically an awkward "table" (see scikit-hep/awkward#2597).
The only limitation wrt to astropy tables is the support of units which is still under development (see scikit-hep/awkward#2468).
The metadata (in XCDF the "comments" section) might be simply loaded as an array of awkward records.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: