You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While explaining closure, the line: "(a+b-n)G=aG+bG-nG=aG+bG-O=aG+bG" appears to have a capital-oh: Is that meant to be? what does O stand for, order? or should that be zero 0 for point at infinity?
While explaining commutativity and associativity in Ch03, the asciidoc uses P, Q, and R while the images in figure 8 and 9 switch to using symbols A, B, and C. (fixed in commit bf91399)
Under 'Defining the curve for Bitcoin':
the second bullet-point mis-spells 'finite' with a missing 'i'.
the sentence: "The curve was chosen, in part, because n is so close to P." uses a capital-P while 'p' for prime is printed in lowercase elsewhere.
In the side note for 'Why Double-sha256?', the last phrase has an additional 'is' and the word 'possible' seems redundant preceding the word 'potential'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While explaining closure, the line: "(a+b-n)G=aG+bG-nG=aG+bG-O=aG+bG" appears to have a capital-oh: Is that meant to be? what does O stand for, order? or should that be zero 0 for point at infinity?
While explaining commutativity and associativity in Ch03, the asciidoc uses P, Q, and R while the images in figure 8 and 9 switch to using symbols A, B, and C.(fixed in commit bf91399)Under 'Defining the curve for Bitcoin':
In the side note for 'Why Double-sha256?', the last phrase has an additional 'is' and the word 'possible' seems redundant preceding the word 'potential'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: