Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove babel-polyfill dependency #748

Closed
damianobarbati opened this issue Jun 7, 2019 · 3 comments 路 Fixed by #783
Closed

Remove babel-polyfill dependency #748

damianobarbati opened this issue Jun 7, 2019 · 3 comments 路 Fixed by #783
Labels
bug there is a bug in the way jimp behaves released This issue/pull request has been released.

Comments

@damianobarbati
Copy link

damianobarbati commented Jun 7, 2019

Current Behavior

Having jimp as a dependency results now in the following warning when running yarn install:

warning html5-webpack-plugin > favicons > jimp > @babel/polyfill@7.4.4: 馃毃 As of Babel 7.4.0, this
package has been deprecated in favor of directly
including core-js/stable (to polyfill ECMAScript
features) and regenerator-runtime/runtime
(needed to use transpiled generator functions):

  > import "core-js/stable";
  > import "regenerator-runtime/runtime";
@XhmikosR
Copy link

Can someone make a patch about this?

@pi0
Copy link

pi0 commented Aug 30, 2019

If you are using jimp for Node.js (not browser) you may try jimp-compact a repackaged version which is much smaller and also hasn't a dependency on jimp.

NOTE: This is NOT an official solution.

@hipstersmoothie hipstersmoothie added the bug there is a bug in the way jimp behaves label Sep 3, 2019
@hipstersmoothie
Copy link
Collaborator

馃殌 Issue was released in v0.6.8 馃殌

@hipstersmoothie hipstersmoothie added the released This issue/pull request has been released. label Sep 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug there is a bug in the way jimp behaves released This issue/pull request has been released.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants