Firefox extension useful?

[pierreozoux]

I can see here: https://meet.jit.si/config.js that there is not extension id for firefox?

Does it mean that firefox doesn't need extension anymore? Thanks for clarifying the doubts.

[saghul]

It's not set because each deployment needs its own, as the domain is validated and no wildcards are allowed AFAIK. Now, in Firefox >= 52 no extension is needed.

[saghul]

Oh, wait you mean in our deployment! Yeah, I'm not sure why we don't have it there, since it's needed for Firefox <= 51. @damencho do you know if this was intentional?

[damencho]

Yep it is intentional. For FF you need an extension which will whitelist your domain, or you can request in FF bug tracker (not sure exactly where) to whitelist your domain inside FF. Since some version meet.jit.si is whitelisted inside FF.

[pierreozoux]

Amazing answer, thank you very much!

…

On 22-03-2017 13:41, Дамян Минков wrote: Yep it is intentional. For FF you need an extension which will whitelist your domain, or you can request in FF bug tracker (not sure exactly where) to whitelist your domain inside FF. Since some version meet.jit.si is whitelisted inside FF. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#25 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABxvHYGtajgv1SK8-nUQ4zrlujkZthMbks5roSUWgaJpZM4MlGUj>.

-- I use PGP to protect our privacy, if you want to know more, you can follow this https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask. You can verify my public key here: https://keybase.io/pierreozoux

[pierreozoux]

Ok, sorry, actually, all the information is here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Screensharing

Maybe it is worth removing the firefox folder? and have a note in the README to point to it, for people using <52?

[saghul]

I'd leave the FF extension code at least until FF >= 52 hits ESR.