-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Vi/Vim bias. #124
Comments
I am biased toward vim, but regardless I think there's a mixed message to say that someone should learn enacts though it won't always be installed. |
Most of the time it will, and it is straight forward to do apt-get / yum / port / etc. People are going to be installing the web server / language etc that they want to use, so don't be so obviously and obnoxiously biased. |
vi is the ideal choice due to its availability on most installations, you can't argue against that. The statement about no competition or hipster editors would be better left out. |
As biased as it may be, it certainly lends entertainment value to what could |
I think the real value of this entry is in the first sentence: "Learn at least one text-based editor well" Since we shouldn't let this turn into a religious war (which is easy for the Vi/Emacs discussion) - shouldn't we leave it at this first sentence? We can list some examples, like "for example Vi(m), Emacs, Nano or Ed" - well maybe we should skip the last one... The only other option would be to list every single text-based editor, but then someone is going to complain about the order in which they are listed. |
Seems like the most useful solution to me. I think including Ed would be cute. |
Reworded based on the discussion in jlevy#124.
I've created #129 based on this... Feel free to review/comment. |
Specifically...
This simply isn't true, it should be redacted.
I suggest something a little more balanced.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: