Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Acceptance test framework helpers #55

Closed
hedgehog opened this issue Nov 8, 2011 · 5 comments
Closed

Acceptance test framework helpers #55

hedgehog opened this issue Nov 8, 2011 · 5 comments

Comments

@hedgehog
Copy link

hedgehog commented Nov 8, 2011

Perhaps I have misunderstood Serve's scope:

It seems natural to want to use the same acceptance test framework when describing your prototype, as you do for the actual end product.

Hence it would be nice to have some such option

Serve.bdd_framework = :capybara

This would ensure capybara's rspec helpers are available?

Sensible

@revans
Copy link
Contributor

revans commented Nov 8, 2011

I agree on using an acceptance testing framework. Serve doesn't necessarily need to do anything to allow this. You should be able to use cucumber + capybara in your own project to get this going.

@hedgehog
Copy link
Author

hedgehog commented Nov 8, 2011

Okay, what had me puzzled was the documentation on Serve's helpers. Are they guaranteed not to conflict with webrat/capybara et al.?

@revans
Copy link
Contributor

revans commented Nov 8, 2011

I don't know for certain as I haven't put any acceptance framework into a serve project. I'd be interested in hear about your experiences, if you decide to do that.

@ntalbott
Copy link
Contributor

ntalbott commented Apr 6, 2012

@hedgehog did you make any progress on this? Would love to hear your experiences.

@hedgehog
Copy link
Author

@ntalbott, Sorry no progress. I'm using middleman and octopress right now. Feel free to close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants