New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Shift the GET text from the Base64 text to the bit.ly shortcode. #17

Closed

jmduke opened this issue Oct 22, 2013 · 1 comment

Labels

Owner

jmduke commented Oct 22, 2013

Advantages: way, way cleaner, and we could bypass using bit.ly altogether except for expansion/shortening.

Disadvantages: an extra call to bit.ly. Since we're sending a call to them anyway for encoding, this doesn't seem like a particularly big deal.

Owner Author

jmduke commented Oct 23, 2013

jmduke closed this as completed

This issue was closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment