Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Pretty print oilist #36

Open
FerreolS opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Pretty print oilist #36

FerreolS opened this issue May 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@bourgesl @FerreolS
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@FerreolS
Copy link
Member

oip list and oip list_baselines output are a bit messy and it is difficult to assess which value belong to which field.
As an example:

oilist 2018-12-14T051749_HD45677_IR-LM_IN_IN_cal_oifits_0.fits
target_name	s_ra	s_dec	t_exptime	t_min	t_max	em_res_power	em_min	em_max	facility_name	instrument_name	nb_vis	nb_vis2	nb_t3	nb_channels	
HD45677	97.072017	-13.05308	0.07500000298023224	58466.225046249856	58466.23150952865	47.39237355339858	2.841224613803206E-6	4.209076450933935E-6	VLTI	MATISSE	6	6	4	64
@FerreolS FerreolS added the enhancement New feature or request label May 21, 2021
@FerreolS
Copy link
Member Author

oip list and oip list_baselines should also print the same information order. As an example: facility | instrument | target name | target position .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bourgesl bourgesl

@FerreolS FerreolS

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bourgesl @FerreolS