Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

n_jobs ignored #31

Open
academe-01 opened this issue Mar 5, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

n_jobs ignored #31

academe-01 opened this issue Mar 5, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@academe-01
Copy link

Following any example from this rep while I set n_jobs=1 I still have 100% load on my cores,
each process occupies all cores (128 in my case).
Any ideas why ?

@vojta-kubin
Copy link

Hi, I bet you mean the prune_df method. We have the same issue. IMO the issue is in usage of the dcor package. It didn't used to support any parallelization, but now it should and it is not being used that way in the method.

There is a discussion on this topic on stackoverflow where the creator of the dcor package explains the solution. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49925718/parallel-calculation-of-distance-correlation-dcor-from-dataframe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants