Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjustable Window frame request #462

Closed
Lumanet2012 opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #497
Closed

Adjustable Window frame request #462

Lumanet2012 opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #497
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Lumanet2012
Copy link

Currently the Plugin has a height limitation of what can be seen by default.
It would be nice to have a field Bed Visualizer Settings --> Visualization where you define also the height of the plugin.
The reason given is by default the graph window adjust to the width automatically but on the height it cut's off the graph and there for it is not fully visable and forces it to be way to small on a bigger display.
To date a lot of people have widescreens so it would be a nice feature if we can add this field.

@jneilliii
Copy link
Owner

Added with above commit, you can change the plugin's release channel to Release Candidate in OctoPrint's software update settings and upgrade when prompted.

image

@jneilliii jneilliii mentioned this issue Jan 1, 2022
jneilliii added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 1, 2022
* add ability to configure graph height in visualization settings, #462
* add min, max, and variance values of graphed mesh, #286
* add OctoDash support, create Custom Action with `[!WEB]http://127.0.0.1:5000/plugin/bedlevelvisualizer/bedlevelvisualizer` as the command.
* adjust the tables for better theme support, #479
* add option for showing mesh data on tab, #496
* remove tooltip hover on tables, #490
* add Prusa adjustment values to graph (still needs verification), #242
* add appearance > title setting to automatically downloaded snapshots, #494
* update docs and screenshots, #335, #358, #468
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants