Hawkmoth process signature proof-of-concept #135
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Proof of concept with no regard to interface.
'make html' demonstrates the bools show up as _Bool in documentation.
A quick hack to replace _Bool with bool in the Sphinx directive signatures.
|
Yup, this would settle one of the points where we disagreed: extensibility. Best of both worlds :) |
This was referenced Aug 10, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I looked at #92 when going through the issues, and did a quick hack towards a proof-of-concept
hawkmoth-process-signatureevent.I'm not pursuing this for the next release, but it's something to consider in the future. Looks like this could be fairly simple. You can pretty nicely convert
_Booltoboolif you like, with no hardcoded stuff in the parser. Maybe users want to annotate other stuff (where the clang cursor might be useful too).Food for though, @BrunoMSantos