Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Browserless Free Tier No Longer Available: Alternative Required #125

Closed
DLWCMD opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Browserless Free Tier No Longer Available: Alternative Required #125

DLWCMD opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@DLWCMD
Copy link

DLWCMD commented Jun 24, 2024

I am trying to implement the Trip Planner example function. However, it requires a Browserless API key, and the free tier that you cited in your example is no longer available. Further, Browserless may be required for other examples, so we need a free alternative. FYI, the minimum tier charge is now $200 as shown below.

What can you recommend?

Thanks.

Screenshot 2024-06-24 at 11 19 41 AM
@faspina
Copy link

faspina commented Jul 3, 2024

I was just looking at this. can't play $200 a month just to learn Crew AI. Any alternatives?

@Jzimmer01
Copy link

I am in same position. I would like to learn by completing your tutorials and examples, but can't justify $200 month subscription. An alternative would be greatly appreciated.

@faspina
Copy link

faspina commented Jul 3, 2024

I found a Browerless docker container it looks like its the same API set to local host. I might play with that over the next couple of days to see if I can get it to work.

https://github.com/browserless/browserless?tab=readme-ov-file

EDIT: This was pretty easy to test after all. I cranked up the Browserless V2 docker container and copied the API into the ENV file. Then I changed the URL base in the brower_tools.py file, and it worked perfectly.

I use Unraid as a local server its not beefy enough to host my own LLM . The Browserless v2 docker was one of the docker templates.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

Copy link

This issue was closed because it has been stale for 5 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants