Ask Moritz questions

[joclement]

Questions:

1. Is it a good idea to check the PDDC Analyzer code? If yes, where is it?
2. Which defect types should I classify? Should I differentiate normal particle from spiral particle? (Refer to what Lukas did)
3. Is there a class noise? Noise it mentioned in research from TU Graz.
4. On p. 82 it is written: "Fuer die Spitze an ... [HS] ist kein Zusammenhang ersichtlich". Wieso nicht? Die sind doch aehnlich.
5. Warum fehlt bei der Zielbereichsanalyse eine Messung beim Testen des Verfahrens? Ich sehe nur 4, bei den anderen beiden werden 5 benutzt. Ich glaube, dass die Messung mit der Klasse Spitze an Erde fehlt.
6. Should I look for other GIL DC PD datasets to have more data or see whether learning can be transferred?
7. Should I compare my methods to Lukas mean difference method?
8. Is using pictures with references okay?
9. Why should I be careful with the direct translation of DC and AC to Gleich- and Wechselspannung?
10. Is the misclassification of every class equally important? Probably not, right? The reason is that some defect types cause more harm than others? Should I respect this when training a classifier or just accuracy as the training metric?

[joclement]

Answers to above questions:

1. I didn't ask that questions, because other tasks are currently important. I will get the analyzer program from the TU. That is good enough.
2. No, I shouldn't differentiate normal from spiral particle. The classes to differentiate are mainly for the beginning: Protrusion, Free Moving Particle, and Particle on Insulator.
3. No, there is no noise (for now).
4. I didn't ask this question. It's actually not so important.
5. Also not so important. I didn't ask this.
6. No, don't look now.
7. Yes, I will do that.
8. I didn't ask this, but it seems to be fine.
9. My usage is fine.
10. The particle failure is the most critical defect type. For the beginning I should see the correct classification of every type as equally important.