-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible bypass #10
Comments
This reminds me of an issue that I forgot about. If you run |
the message pops up infront of the slimlock screen, but i can not bypass slimlock. |
I hate this bug. What other applications did you have running when the screen was locked? Have you let it run for this long before, and if so were you able to bypass it then as well? Also, how exactly did you bypass it? When you went to unlock it, was slimlock's window visible? If so, what caused it to go away? |
i opened this bug after i found out it's reproducable. it happened twice to me. i will try now to let it happen again and tell you all details and anomalities i may find. i use gentoo with dwm window manager and only had 1 or 2 terminals open at that time. i was able to bypass it like that:
but as i said before, this only happens after a long time of inactivity, of maybe 20, maybe 30 hours and more. more results in a few days ;) |
I have the opposite problem (but maybe related, because it also happens after a long time of inactivity, so I post it here): if I leave slimlock on for several hours (say, leave work in the afternoon, come back the next morning) I cannot unlock it, no matter what I do. Slimlock is unresponsive. I cannot enter my password. I must ctrl+alt+f1, login in vt and killall -9 slimlock from there. Also in gentoo, git version. |
Eek. Would either one of you guys be able to test xscreensaver to see if it suffers from the same issues? If you do, I imagine it would be much easier to either run a second X server instance or to run it in something like Xephyr. |
I updated to latest git after my post and haven't had my issue since then. Maybe it was caused by something else. Right now it works perfectly. Sorry for the noise :). |
I'm closing this issue now. I'm using slimlock on a very unstable system and can hardly reproduce the behaviour mentioned above. If someone else comes across this issue, simply re-open it. |
hi,
i recently noticed that i can bypass slimlock after long times of inactivity. if i don't use the computer for more than 24h (estimated) i can unlock the screen without entering a password: moving the mouse displays the slimlock login screen, but pressing any key removes the lockscreen without entering a password.
while browsing the internet i found a similar problem posted by an arch linux user - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=134300
i'm using gentoo with slimlock v0.11...
cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: