- Add external field to skip signature decoration #40
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Fair enough, Is your comment the right way round though? false skips decoration no? |
|
Just noticed that myself. Done. |
|
Anything else? Otherwise I'll merge. Thanks! |
|
Nope, all good on my end. Do the thing! |
johnno1962
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2022
* - Add external field to skip signature decoration
johnno1962
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2022
* Expand interpose api to trace a type. * - Add external field to skip signature decoration (#40) * - Add external field to skip signature decoration Co-authored-by: tikimcfee <ivan.lugo@knights.ucf.edu>
johnno1962
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2022
* Expand interpose api to trace a type. * - Add external field to skip signature decoration (#40) * - Add external field to skip signature decoration Co-authored-by: tikimcfee <ivan.lugo@knights.ucf.edu>
johnno1962
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2022
* Expand interpose api to trace a type. * - Add external field to skip signature decoration (#40) * - Add external field to skip signature decoration Co-authored-by: tikimcfee <ivan.lugo@knights.ucf.edu>
johnno1962
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2022
* Expand interpose api to trace a type. * - Add external field to skip signature decoration (#40) * - Add external field to skip signature decoration Co-authored-by: tikimcfee <ivan.lugo@knights.ucf.edu>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey! I've been using this as a simple but effective workaround for functions with particularly long or troublesome values. It's fairly blunt, as it directly returns an entry or exit signature if the flag is off, but so far, this has let me get to to high level function invocations, and cleared out string spew.
Happy to include any other suggested changes, offer a hand elsewhere in this vein, or simply to close it down if you feel there are better options. For example, I could see there being a much more robust registration of specific function signatures to skip.
Cheers!