-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
standard library not aligned #65
Comments
@thesave what about this issue? It seems it still persists |
I think it's still your old system, which is simply... Not used by the
DevOps pipeline. :-)
…On Tue, 18 May 2021, 17:47 thesave, ***@***.***> wrote:
I think this and #66 <#66> and #62
<#62> are all related.
However, I do not know how we now generate the docs for the standard
library after we moved to the new system.
@bmaschio <https://github.com/bmaschio>, @xiroV <https://github.com/xiroV>
do you have a pointer to that? Do we use joliedoc?
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#65 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAP3DSNOTSQGAPAYJWA6U53TOKD25ANCNFSM4ZQ3W2CA>
.
|
This continues to be an issue, e.g. als the |
Also |
At the moment, metaservice is not delivered as a package, I think it is very useful to have it, also because some tools like jolier exploits it for working. @fmontesi wanted to refactor it, but I don't know if this activity is completed or not. I think that if the refactoring is not ready, we can publish metaservice as a package by now. |
@kicito I think you're the last one who looked at the problem of generating the documentation for the standard library. Was there any progress there? In any case, we have the problem of updating the documentation website whenever I release a new version of Jolie. So, probably, the best choice is that the DevOps pipeline for Jolie releases (from github.com/jolie/jolie) also somehow updates the website's documentation for the right version. @kicito @mwallnoefer @klag what do you think? Or do you have other ideas? @klag @mwallnoefer Regarding |
Yes I can do. In the meanwhile I am refactoring jolier, I'll do alltogether |
I should have time to address this issue related to generating documentation for the standard library from this week. I'm unsure if joliedoc will be compatible with the new syntax, but updating the code should be straightforward. I agree that it should be a GitHub action from the main repository jolie/jolie, which builds the HTML and packs it into an artifact. This would then trigger jolie/doc and update the content. |
it seems that the standard library into the documentation is not aligned with the actual one in the repo.
ex: RuntimeService
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: