Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new feature to load common option settings from configuration file #86

Closed
raphaelstolt opened this issue Mar 1, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@raphaelstolt
Copy link
Contributor

What's your opinion on adding an optional option to load common options settings (e.g. namespace, testing framework, editor config, ...), which might be standardised for a company or organisation, from a configuration file?

 -c, --configuration[=CONFIGURATION]  Generate from configuration file [default: "/home/<username>/.construct"]

Which configuration format (e.g. ini, yaml, toml, json) would you prefer?

@jonathantorres
Copy link
Owner

I'm definitely not against it. If you have the time, go for it! I would prefer the yaml format.

raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2016
raphaelstolt added a commit to raphaelstolt/construct that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants