You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was using purrr to simulate a palette with all the color deficiencies, which works fine. But it would be great if I could also include an option for "normal", which would return the palette unchanged for comparison.
library(magrittr)
library(purrr)
c("prot", "deut", "trit") %>%
map(~dichromat(blues9, type = .))
Having an option for "normal" inside that first vector would mean being able to generate a figure like this in just a couple lines:
I imagine this is an easier feature than vectorizing dichromat to accept a vector of arguments to type =.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was using
purrr
to simulate a palette with all the color deficiencies, which works fine. But it would be great if I could also include an option for "normal", which would return the palette unchanged for comparison.Having an option for "normal" inside that first vector would mean being able to generate a figure like this in just a couple lines:
I imagine this is an easier feature than vectorizing dichromat to accept a vector of arguments to
type =
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: